1. Lamborghini Murcielago
It turns out that "Lamborghini Murcielago" is Italian for "I HAVE NO SOUL". This has a hefty estimated 34.3 barrels/year of petroleum consumption rate and estimated 18.3 tons of CO2 released annually. Hey, maybe you can even get baby seal skin instead of plain ol' leather for the seats. It gets 8mpg, which I'm surprised isn't illegal...wait, no...no, I'm not. That's a little over half of what a Hummer H2 consumes, folks.
If you see one of these please, please, please vandalize it in any way possible. I'm not condoning illegal activity, so vandalize it legally. Or whatever. And if someone you know is planning on buying one, punch them in the face as hard as you can. Once for being willing to spend $361,700 on a car, and again for being a dick.
2. Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG (wagon)
Not only is this car so hideous that it makes me want to wash my eyes with acid, it also gets 12mpg. I think I'll call this one Big Ugly. One would imagine that that would be my endearment for a H1 Hummer, but it's actually I Hate You, and I do this cute little hand signal with it.
It seems that the Benz's marketing scheme is will be providing an alternative to its equally offensive but now "uncool" counterpart: the SUV? See, it's a station wagon, but it can go 60mph in 4 seconds. This is a highly necessary feature for the over-privileged suburbanite on the go. After all, little Jimmy must learn to substitute useless material objects for happiness at an early age.
3. Volkswagen Passat Wagon
Just a couple mpgs over the "Gas Guzzler" line at 20mpg, this is a car that I, personally, probably wouldn't risk a lawsuit to dump a bucket of paint on. I don't love or even like it, yet I'm as not filled with uncontrollable rage when I lay eyes on it. Its carbon footprint is less than half of the Lamborbastard, emitting 8.0 tons of CO2 per year. So, if you must tote around several children and are too insecure about your "image" to get a more practical vehicle, get some metal pretentiousness.
2. Toyota Prius
Once again, Japan wins. This is technically a midsize car and rolls in at 48mpg with a CO2 emission level of 4.0. It's a hybrid which means that it contains a battery that will expire in 5 years or so that undoubtedly contains fun carcinogens such as lead, nickel, and lithium, but the bright side is that Toyota will allegedly be offering a $200 bounty to ensure the batteries are sent in for recycling. If the company actually does this and if it will be effective are concerns that can only be answered when the time comes, unfortunately. Until hydrogen makes a stable debut, you'll have to settle for this if you "need" a new car.
1. Any Diesel Car
Yes, my friends, the ordinary diesel car is the least terrible vehicle to buy this year. You see, this may appear to be an ordinary car, but it could have a heart of pure used straight vegetable oil, or SVO. Now, I'm not a specialist on converting a diesel car to biodiesel, but the folks at www.goldenfuelsystems.com are. I do know that running a previously environmentally detrimental vehicle on recycled vegetable oil is fucking AWESOME. The conversion kits run only about $600, but since you'll probably be getting your oil from restaurants for free this price will seem insignificant. Come on, free gas. Also, you get to not be a wasteful, lazy bastard.
16 comments:
What are you fucking stupid? First of all, that pic is not of a Lamborghini Murcielago. Second of all, do you know frequently Murcielagos roam the road? They see at maximum, a few thousand miles annually. You think all the Murcielagos (which can be numbered by the mere thousands) are causing environmental problems? Think again dipshit.
Do you think people daily drive their $350,000 cars like they would a Honda Civic? If anything, the Murcielago should be exempt from strict emissions requirements.
Now STFU because you're not fooling anybody.
And VANDALIZE it? You are encouraging people to vandalize a Murcielago if they see one?
Tell me, kiddie, in what legal way should you vandalize something? I didn't realize vandalizing in any which way was legal. Go ahead. Let's hear it.
And you want to unfuck the earth; your mere existence is contributing to the earth being fucked.
two words for this guy that posted the murcielago bit. "YOUAREADUMBFUCKTARDED IDIOT"
If this is what environmentalists are like, I'd rather NOT be one, EVER.
This guy is a complete idiot. An arrogant, stupid, misguided and NOT CLEVER idiot who thinks far too much of himself.
I live in Kansas and own a Lamborghini Murcielago. Not only is that not a murcielago in the pictures you have, but you got to be the dumbest, smelly hatchet wound of a cunt I have ever heard of in Kansas.
Go ahead and vandalize my car. Please burn it! I am ready to buy a new one!
Why would you care if someone spends their money how they want? The price of gas, repairs, and MSRP are nothing to us. If it DID matter...there are so few cars that it wont put a dent in the global amounts. They make more Ford Tarus cars a day than Lambo does in 30 years.
Where do you get that the average car uses 34 barrels a year? Not only are there few of these cars in existence, but they dont drive them everywhere.
Get a life dumb fuck.
I think I see jealousy. So someone who works hard to achieve a Lamborghini you think they are a dick. It is their fault they went out and worked hard well you sat on your ass? Maybe everyone should punch you in the face for having such a pathetic life
you fucking cocksucker jealous bastard, come and vandalize my Murci, my foot would be so far up your ass you won't shit right for a month.
Comment From Mr Vrooom:
Someone tell that dumb eco-fuck that if one single Murci(or SL) gets vandalized for any reason, retaliation will be swift and deadly for a bunch of big ass trees in the forest!!
I'll leave my 1991 Lamborghini Diablo running for two hours while I go to the gym. What you gonna do about that eco-freak?
Vandalize my Murcielago...and I'll get it unvandalized, simple as that. And you know what? The cost of unvandalizing my Murcielago will no doubt add pollution to the Earth. Paint in the ozone, new body panels need be welded...all that shit affects the Earth. So really your methods are METHODS AGAINST YOUR CAUSE.
And why do you have the Prius on this list? Toyota said they will recycle the batteries, so what's the problem? You got them on the list because of your pessimistic SPECULATION? Dumbasses like you help to slow down the advancements of technology...so by asking us to stop buying Prius' you may be asking us to stop funding a possible EARTH SAVING INVENTION.
You will never be me, I am better than you.
Do your homework before you post such BS.
First of all as others have said the average Lamborghini puts on about 200 - 2000 miles per year, they are not used daily and by no means would be as large of an impact to the environment as you post.
Vandalizing anyone's property is illegal, plain and simple! What do you think you are doing to the environment having vehicles damaged and then repaired....DUH!
What impact do you think a soccer mom driving her kids around making 20000+ miles per year in her SUV making around 12mpg is doing!
Why don't you put your mind into trying to come up with ways to make an environment friendly fuel or better emmissions instead of coming up with ways to make further damage to the environment and private property.
So we've established that the poster is a moron.
Any comment on that, moron?
To the man who posted the MURCI bit... Kill yourself. With smug little fucks like you running around no one will ever be green.
Fucking idiots like you discredit the whole idea of environmental protection.
Ferrari recently expanded their factory and now make 10 000 cars a year. Lamborghini makes even less. The total production numbers of all supercars in the world must be around 100K/year. Meanwhile, Toyota alone produces about 10 million (!) cars/year. There are also trucks, which have bad mpg/co2 ratings but are way more numerous than supercars and way more heavily driven. Your little escapade is utterly pointless, retard.
Lets have a look at the posters carbon footprint.
He probably spent a couple of hours on the internet looking for facts and figures to try to justify his useless post.
In doing so he used electricity, probably generated by coal, to produce an articale that is of absolutly no benifit to society.
Then he posted the article, and in turn, people used electricity on their own computers to view this useless article. So thats a whole lot of energy used, and with no tangible benifit to anyone, except to make the poster feel better about his sad, pathetic, unfulfilled life, which is probably why he's a greenie in the first place.
Luckily for you my friend the eco bandwagon has become more of a fashion statement than a cause these days, and its easy for simpletons like yourself to jump on it, especially when most big name celebrities are doing the same these days.
Its people like you who make the world a worse place for others, moronically striving to achieve your cause and blinded by your own ignorance to the faults of the cause in which you follow, and of your own stupidity.
Post a Comment